Skywatcher Evostar 72ED Refractor

My first ever telescope, and the one that started all of this. A 72mm ED doublet apochromat at 420mm focal length, f/5.8. Light enough to sit on a small mount without complaint, and short enough to frame large nebulae. Doubles as a guidescope and as a grab-and-go visual instrument.

Recommended constantly, for unglamorous reasons

The Evostar 72ED appears in more "first serious telescope" recommendations than almost anything else, and the reasons are all practical. Seventy-two millimetres at 420mm focal length, f/5.8, using an air-spaced doublet with an ED element, and a tube weighing around two kilograms.

That combination lands somewhere useful. 420mm frames most large nebulae comfortably on a small sensor. f/5.8 gathers signal well without demanding the tolerances a faster system does. Two kilograms sits within the comfortable range of even modest mounts, so the mount you already own can probably carry it. The Monkey Head from Al Qudra is this telescope's work, through the L-eXtreme.

Doublet rather than triplet

Two elements instead of three means less glass, less weight, lower cost and slightly less complete colour correction. At f/5.8 a good ED doublet controls false colour well enough that it is not the limiting factor in a deep-sky image, with any residual showing first around bright stars. The money not spent on a third element is money available for the mount, which will affect your results more.

The reducer and flattener, and why it matters

I bought mine with a StellaMira 2 inch 0.8x reducer and field flattener, and it is worth explaining what that piece of glass actually does, because the name describes two separate jobs.

The flattener half. A lens does not bring light to focus on a flat surface. It focuses onto a gently curved one, a little like the inside of a very shallow bowl. Your eye copes with that without noticing. A camera sensor cannot, because a sensor is rigidly flat. Put a flat sensor against a curved focal surface and the centre can be sharp while the corners are not, which shows up as stars that smear outwards towards the edges of the frame. The flattener adds glass that bends the outer light back into line, so the surface the telescope focuses onto matches the surface the sensor occupies.

The reducer half. The same glass also shortens the effective focal length, in this case to eight tenths of the original. That has two consequences worth knowing.

How a 0.8x reducer and flattener changes the light path Two diagrams. In the upper one the telescope focuses onto a gently curved surface, so the centre of the frame lands on the flat sensor while the edges focus just short of it and stars there smear. In the lower one a reducer element steepens the converging beam, shortening the focal length and straightening the focal surface so the whole frame lands on the sensor together. Without a reducer or flattener 72mm objective edges focus short 420mm, f/5.8 centre sharp, corners smear flat sensor With the 0.8x reducer and flattener 72mm objective reducer 55mm backfocus 336mm, f/4.7 sharp across the frame wider field, less exposure time
Exaggerated for clarity. The reducer steepens the converging beam, which shortens the focal length and brings focus closer, and at the same time straightens the focal surface so it matches the flat sensor. The 55mm spacing between the reducer and the sensor is what makes both effects work.

First, the field of view widens by a quarter, so 420mm becomes an effective 336mm. Targets that were tight in the frame get room around them.

Second, the focal ratio drops from f/5.8 to about f/4.7. Because light gathering scales with the square of that ratio, the system collects signal roughly one and a half times faster, so a given amount of signal arrives in about a third less time. On a night with a narrow window before the target sets, or from a balcony where every extra minute of sky glow works against you, that is a real difference rather than a specification.

What you give up is a little resolution, since the same detail now falls on fewer pixels. On a small sensor at 420mm, that trade usually favours the reducer.

Getting the spacing right

The number that matters is 55mm. That is the distance the StellaMira needs between the back of the reducer and the sensor itself, and it is not a suggestion. Too long or too short by a couple of millimetres and stars in the corners start to stretch, which looks exactly like the problem the flattener was bought to fix. Camera, adapters and spacer rings all count towards that 55mm, so it is worth working the arithmetic out on paper before ordering anything.

Two details make this easier on the 72ED specifically. The reducer carries an integrated M48 camera thread, and removing its 2 inch nosepiece reveals an M54 female thread, which matches the M54 output on the Evostar's focuser. Threaded connections hold spacing far more reliably than a compression fit, and they do not let anything rotate slightly during a long session.

What else you will want

The supplied focuser is a 2 inch dual-speed Crayford with 10:1 fine focus, genuinely good at this price, and it takes the EAF without complaint. Plan the filter drawer into the spacing arithmetic from the start rather than adding it afterwards, since it sits in the same 55mm and changes the sums.

At 420mm and two kilograms it also makes a pleasant grab-and-go visual instrument, which is easier to justify than a telescope that only ever does one job.

Getting one in the UAE

Mine came from Amazon.ae, which makes this one of the easier telescopes to acquire here: local stock, local delivery, no forwarder and no import charges. For a telescope that is a real advantage, since shipping something this size and weight internationally can add a substantial fraction of its price.

Where to buy

Some links above are affiliate links. If you buy through them I may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you. It does not affect which gear I use or recommend. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.